Equitable Easements in California

As we have discussed in previous posts, there are many methods of creating an easement. Today, we discuss the creation of an easement based on principles of equity.

In certain situations where you cannot establish a prescriptive easement for a physical encroachment, you may be able to establish an equitable easement. In fact, most, if not all, cases that grant equitable easements arise out of physical encroachments that otherwise qualify as prescriptive easements. (See Christensen v. Tucker (1952) 114 Cal.App.2d 554 [affirming an equitable easement to maintain concrete wall encroaching on neighbor’s property]; Hirshfield v. Schwartz (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 749 [affirming an equitable easement to maintain extensive landscaping and irrigation encroaching on and under neighbor’s property]; Field-Escandon v. Demann, supra, 204 Cal.App.3d 228 [affirming an equitable easement to maintain a sewer pipe line encroaching over neighbor’s property].)

To determine whether you are entitled to an equitable easement, courts utilize a “relative hardship” test. (Tashakori v. Lakis (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1003, 1009.) Under the relative hardship test, three factors are required to establish an equitable easement: (1) the defendant must be innocent, i.e. his or her encroachment must not be willful or negligent; (2) unless rights to the public would be harmed, the court should enjoin the encroachment if the plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury, regardless of the injury to the defendant; and (3) the hardship to the defendant by enjoining the encroachment must be greatly disproportionate to the hardship caused to the plaintiff by allowing the encroachment to remain. (Id.) Some negligence on the part of the claimant will not defeat an equitable easement. (Christensen v. Tucker (1952) 114 Cal.App.2d 554, 564.)

Unlike other methods of easement creation, if the court determines that an equitable easement exists, the property owners are generally entitled to damages. (See Christensen v. Tucker (1952) 114 Cal.App.2d 554.) Nonetheless, obtaining an equitable easement may still result in a net benefit where it may be more costly to remove the encroachments than to pay damages.

Schorr Law has experience analyzing easement disputes related to all types of easements.  We have dealt with this stations across a wide range of situations ranging from retaining walls, driveways, patios, fences, gates and other areas. To inquire about a free consultation, please call (310) 954-1877, email us at info@schorr-law.com or fill out the contact us box on this page.

Share Button
Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Easement, Equitable Easement, Prescriptive Easement

Zachary D. Schorr’s Expert Appearance on the Dr. Phil Show

Zachary D. Schorr’s Expert Appearance on ABC’s Nightline

Contact Schorr Law

Super Lawyers

Zachary Schorr Superlawyers

Zachary D. Schorr has been named to the Southern California Super Lawyers (Rising Stars) list for attorneys in Real Estate for 5 straight years - 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. Each year, no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state receive this honor. In 2016 he was also included as one of the top 100 lawyers in Southern California in this category. The selection for this respected list is made by the research team at Super Lawyers.

Need Representation?

If you are currently involved in a real estate dispute, either commercial real estate or residential, and are looking for a Real Estate Attorney in Los Angeles with a cost-effective, results oriented approach designed to meet your case's specific needs, contact the attorneys at Schorr Law. Our real estate firm has the specific knowledge and experience necessary to get you the best possible results.

AVVO 10.0

Zachary Schorr Avvo Rating

Avvo Clients’ Choice Award Recipient

Zachary Schorr Avvo Client's Choice Award