Creating Easements by Implied Grant or Reservation

Generally, easements can only be created in writing or by prescription. However, under certain circumstances, the law implies that the parties intended to create or transfer an easement by a grant or reservation when there is no written document evidence their intent, and, in some cases, even when there is no oral agreement regarding the easement. This is called an implied easement.

As a general rule, an easement is implied only in those cases where: (a) there is a preexisting use of a portion of the property prior to the transfer; or (b) where the grantor leads the grantee to believe that the grantee will have an easement after the transfer, even though there is no prior use. Specifically, in order for a court to imply the creation of an easement on a division of title, the following conditions must exist at the time of conveyance:

  1. There must be a common ownership of a parcel and a transfer or conveyance of one parcel, or a portion of a parcel, to another.
  2. Prior to the division of title, there must have been an existing obvious, and apparently permanent, use of the quasi-easement by the common owner.
  3. The easement must be reasonably necessary to the use and benefit of the quasi-dominant tenement.

(See Tusher v. Gabrielsen (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 131, 141.)

Based on these requirements, implied easements are usually created when an owner that sells a portion of his property to another. Because the preexisting use is important in defining the nature of the easement, the implied easement arises out of the original owner’s use of his property. Unlike an easement by necessity, which I discuss in a later post, the” reasonably necessary” requirement does not require a strict necessity. Rather, the claimant merely has to show that the use is convenient for the use of the dominant tenement.

Nonetheless, the law does not favor implied easements because they deprive a property owner of exclusive use of his or her own property. (Horowitz v. Noble (1978) 79 Cal.App.3d 120, 131.) Accordingly, the person who claims an implied easement has the burden of proving each element of the cause of action by a preponderance of evidence. In other words, the person who is seeking to establish an implied easement must show that it is more likely than not that they satisfy the requirements.

Schorr Law has experience analyzing easement issues. To inquire about a free consultation please call (310) 954-1877 or email us at You can also send us a message through the Contact Form.


Share Button
Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Easement, Implied Easement

Zachary D. Schorr’s Expert Appearance on the Dr. Phil Show

Zachary D. Schorr’s Expert Appearance on ABC’s Nightline

Contact Schorr Law

Super Lawyers

Zachary Schorr Superlawyers

Zachary D. Schorr has been named to the Southern California Super Lawyers (Rising Stars) list for attorneys in Real Estate for 5 straight years - 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. Each year, no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state receive this honor. In 2016 he was also included as one of the top 100 lawyers in Southern California in this category. The selection for this respected list is made by the research team at Super Lawyers.

Need Representation?

If you are currently involved in a real estate dispute, either commercial real estate or residential, and are looking for a Real Estate Attorney in Los Angeles with a cost-effective, results oriented approach designed to meet your case's specific needs, contact the attorneys at Schorr Law. Our real estate firm has the specific knowledge and experience necessary to get you the best possible results.

AVVO 10.0

Zachary Schorr Avvo Rating

Avvo Clients’ Choice Award Recipient

Zachary Schorr Avvo Client's Choice Award